To listen to Pres. Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Bernie Sanders and others in the political hierarchy, you'd think that the greatest threat to world peace is “global warming” (a/k/a climate change). Do you believe them?
Yes, there are catastrophes that occur around the world that cause death, injury, and destruction to innocent people, and that has been going on since recorded history, even before the use of fossil fuels. Mother Nature is responsible, not man for these climate Armageddons, so how can man control Mother Nature?
Realistically, can these “doom and gloom” climate change agitators prove that they can prevent tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, droughts, floods and a host of other dire happenings that occur every year somewhere around the world?
What's amazing is that if you question these “chicken littles”, you are deemed an “evil” climate change denier, and in some cases, are deemed to be subject to criminal charges (ex: Sen. Sheldon Whiteside of Rhode Island, is proposing a bill to make “deniers” subject to R.I.C.O. Statutes). Can you imagine, so-called intelligent politicians (and citizens), who want to prosecute others who have a different view from theirs, are to be considered possible criminals? Is that a rational mindset?
Around the world today, we have Islamist terrorists cutting off heads, burning people alive, raping women and young girls etc. and those “global warming” fanatics claim that man-made global warming is the greatest threat to mankind today?
The data has shown that for the past 17 years we have been in a global cooling period, and that the disastrous consequences that they have predicted over the years were just erroneous speculation based on false emotion and not on scientific fact. Al Gore won a Nobel Prize for his movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”, but after close scrutiny, the film was discredited and deemed factually incorrect in many of its claims. Al Gore claimed that man-made global warming was “settled science”, but many highly reputable climatologists have debunked the theory put forth by Al Gore and other climate change alarmists. Some prominent “deniers” are Dr. Richard Lindzen, meteorologist and Alfred P. Sloan professor of climatology at M.I.T. ; Dr. Timothy Ball, former meteorology professor at the Univ. of Winnipeg; and John Coleman, meteorologist and founder of the “Weather Channel” who has called the theory of man-made global warming “the biggest scientific scam in history”. Should those prominent scientists be subject to criminal charges because they question the man-made global warming theory? Might that not go against the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?
So, when our leaders claim that “climate change” is the greatest threat to civilization, you have to wonder about their mental states. As the old saying goes, “You can't fool Mother Nature”, overrides any claim that man can change the environment other than by keeping it clean and free of debris.
Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
2 comments:
According to the prophesy of guru Al Gore in 2000, our coastal areas should now be flooded due to the melting ice caps. What no flooding? This goes to prove the lunacy of these "doom and gloomers" who are supporting this failed man-made climate narrative who are in it just for the money. Take away the government and liberal foundation grants from these "chicken littles" and, voila, global warming goes away. Remember, always follow the money.
Can you imagine if a Republican/Conservative made such an outrageous statement as those two Marxist/Socialist Democrat candidates, who have stated that global warming was a greater threat to peace than Islamic terrorism, all hell would've broken loose in condemnation. Instead, the liberal loons praise them for their "remarkable" sensitivity to the environment. Now you know why liberalism is considered a mental disorder.
Post a Comment