Thursday, May 26, 2016

What is Cranial Rectal Inversion?


Cranial Rectal Inversion (CRI) is a malady (disease) that is mostly contracted by liberals who have their heads so firmly planted up their butts, it is unlikely that they'll ever have another rational point-of-view. It is in most cases, incurable, and they can transfer it to other liberals whom they intermingle with.

The symptoms are very numerous, but I'll try to enumerate the ideas and policies associated with this malady, which causes them and their fellow liberals to be afflicted with this disease.

First off,. The liberals that are infected are in favor of, open borders and giving amnesty to illegal aliens, the more the better; they favor taking money from the rich and giving handouts to the poor ( free stuff); they favor unfettered abortion up till the time of breech (in other words, late-term abortion); they call Wall Street “evil” while taking in millions of dollars in campaign contributions from those very same financial institutions; they believe in same sex marriage and gender neutral bathrooms and shower rooms; they believe in appeasing our avowed enemies while “dissing” our friends ( like Israel); they want to take away the firearms of law abiding citizens while they release thousands of criminals from our jails and prisons; and they turn a blind eye on the corrupt activities of the Clinton's (ex: the Clinton “Crime” Foundation) and their loyal cronies (a/k/a liberals, Progressives, Democrats, and Socialists).

There are many more symptoms as to why the liberals are infected with CRI, but we don't have time or space to enumerate them all. You could say that they have their heads so far up their butts, they can chew their food on the way down, to add to the earlier definition at the beginning of this Pulitzer prize winning editorial (there's no conceit in my family, I have it all).

The cases of CRI sort of escalate generally around the time of an election period. To try to counteract this malady, they (the Democrats) trot out the usual verbal garbage their sleazy focus groups tell them to use to try to slime their opponents (the Republicans) as it has worked in the past. They say Republicans are anti-woman; anti-black; anti-Hispanic; anti-poor; anti-abortion; anti-gays, lesbians, and the new favored class, transgenders (which make up ½ of one-percent of the population) etc. , but it doesn't seem to help them get cured, in fact, it makes their condition much worse.

Just listen to the campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, both of whom have advanced cases of CRI, and it gets worse each and every week they campaign. Whoever gets the Democrat nomination (most likely Hillary, if she doesn't get indicted in the meantime), their cases of CRI will be non-reversible and they will have to bear the agony of being terminally irrelevant, much to the chagrin of Barack Hussein Obama and Debbie Wasserman-Schmutz (her real name in Yiddish).

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann







Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Like Two Pees in a Powder Room


Can we add perversion to Obama's latest fiat about whose space can be invaded
for transgender rights, to pee and shower to match their gender identity? I thought
gender is defined not by emotion, but by our difference in body plumbing and
the part one plays toward procreation. His decree is forcing the majority of people
to forfeit their right to privacy and moral belief to a minuscule proportion of
individuals who may be victims of a freak of nature.

President Obama's daughters will not be exposed to male genitalia in a private school
setting, but the rest of our children attending public education facilities will be if
this blackmail is allowed; obey or lose federal funding.

The liberal mind logic is to destroy the traditional instead of fixing the problem.
Tear down the whole building to fix a leaking faucet.

The whole Obama administration has functioned under this premise of catering to
the few at the detriment and expense of the many.

It will be interesting to see how a lesbian will maneuver a urinal in the men's room
and toilet seats nailed down.

You can be sure the "Political Correct Police" will try to disarm my words by labeling
me homophobic, bigoted and racist, to obliterate my space and my right of expression.

Conservative column from George Giftos







Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Is it Fair to Call Hillary Clinton “Crooked”?


Republican nominee Donald Trump has given Hillary Clinton a new “moniker”, it is the adjective “crooked”. The definition of “crooked” is a person being dishonest, evasive, or illegal. Does it apply to the persona of Hillary Clinton or is it an unfair designation?

Hillary Clinton has been in the political arena for over 25 years and has been the subject of scorn as well as idolatry. It depends on which side of the political spectrum you reside on.

Let's take a look at what has been her history.

Hillary attended Wellesley College and graduated in 1969. As part of her senior thesis, her theme was a positive critique of the works of Saul Alinsky, the author of the radical book entitled, “Rules for Radicals”. Alinsky is known as the father of the public policy of community organizing. Ironically, Pres. Obama also was a disciple of Alinsky and actually taught a class at the Univ. of Chicago on the methods espoused by Alinsky.

After she graduated from Yale Law School in 1973, she went to work for the Chief Counsel of the Senate Watergate Committee, Jerome Zeifman, a Democrat. During her tenure, Zeifman fired her for lying and being unethical. In Zeifman's 2006 book, “Hillary's Pursuit of Power”, Zeifman wrote, “Hillary is unfit to be Senator or President, the last vestiges of the traditional moral authority of the party of Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson will be destroyed”. Also in the mid-90's, noted N.Y. Times columnist, William Safire, called her a “congenital liar”. You could say that those comments about Hillary Clinton were not a ringing endorsement of her character.

From her marriage to Bill Clinton to the present day, she and her husband have been in the center of one scandal after another, but to be honest, they have avoided, up until the present, to not be held liable for most of the charges leveled against them. They have been labeled the “teflon couple” by being able to avoid most legal sanctions including Bill's impeachment, but he was assessed an $850,000 settlement to one of his female accusers, Paula Jones.

The list of scandals that have confronted Hillary and her husband have dogged them ever since their days in Arkansas up till their days in the White House and since, up until today.

Here's a list of some of the nefarious dealings of Hillary and her husband. She claimed back in the 1980's in Arkansas that she was able to turn a $1,000 investment in cattle futures into a $100,000 windfall by reading the Wall Street Journal (it was latter found out that one of Bill Clinton's political cronies did this hanky-panky deal for her as a political favor). While in the White House, she was involved in the “Travelgate” affair (firing, without cause, the people in the presidential travel office to install political cronies); as the person in charge of getting Universal Heath Care, she had secret meetings and in the end, failed to receive any support from either Democrats or Republicans; as her husband was being accused of sexual abuse of women, she was placed in charge of “bimbo eruptions” and tasked to keep these women accusers quiet by smearing them and by intimidation; as a Senate candidate in 2000, she was accused of working with her husband to grant pardons to some Hasidic Jews in New Square, N.Y. For their support for her candidacy in the N.Y. Senate race (the village voted 1,400 to 12 for Hillary, even though the Hasidic community voted Republican overwhelmingly in the past).

As Secretary of State, the scandals continued apace. It has been claimed that there was a “quid pro quo” with her husband's enormous speaking fees and donations to the Clinton Foundation, which resulted in favorable decisions to the donors from Hillary's State Dep't. The straw that broke the camels back was her blatant lying about the murders of 4 Americans in Benghazi (including our Ambassador, Chris Stevens). She, and other Obama Administration spokespeople claimed that the attack on the U.S. compound was because of an inflammatory anti-Islam video, which we now know was a bogus claim. As Hillary has shown, in a message to her daughter on the evening of Sep't. 12, that it was a pre-planned Al-Queda affiliate attack that had nothing to do with a video. She lied !

And finally, (although we could go on and on), her use of a private computer server to conduct official State Dep't. business, which she knew was illegal as she signed a document to that effect when she started as Secretary. She is now the subject of a criminal investigation by the F.B.I. We are now waiting for the F.B.I. report as to whether they will recommend that she be indicted.

With all these instances of the Clinton's dancing around the law for lo these many years, the label “crooked” seems to be a valid designation. What must be determined is whether character matters to the voters or will they overlook her indiscretions and elect her president. God help us if that happens.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann



Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 15, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

The ‘Bernie & Hillary’ Show.
Indulge me as I shall intentionally waste the time it takes to address the gullible loons who comprise the audiences that attend the ‘Bernie & Hillary’ show.  A game show with no surprises or prizes.
It is a conundrum wrapped in a quandary that is inexplicable – how and why so many otherwise seemingly ‘normal’ humans can be so seriously separated from their senses when it comes to slavishly following such oblivious Pied Pipers of Nonsense as Sanders & Clinton.  For anyone to listen attentively to these two for more than 60 seconds is to come to believe that you have lost your mind or your hearing – or both.
These two aliens from Space have one attribute in common - they are able to dispense a stream of tripe, hype, trivia & hogwash for hours on end, with no visible effort.  Apparently, it comes easy to them to drone on endlessly with faux emotion and enthusiasm that is manufactured on-demand.
They make one begin to think in terms of ‘Term Limits’ – not merely for elected office holders but, for certain human lives on this Earth.  I for one, would not miss either Bern or Hill if they were to show up missing for the next 3 or more generations.
Hark!  What is that ruckus I hear in the wings?  Oh, oh.  It’s Biden, Bloomberg and AlGore warming-over their failures -  just in case.  Let’s hear it for the Democrat Partythey never fail to disappoint.

MORT KUFF     © 2-13-2016


The Donald: What Bill Whittle Loves About Donald Trump
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Is Global Warming the Greatest Threat to the Free World?


To listen to Pres. Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Bernie Sanders and others in the political hierarchy, you'd think that the greatest threat to world peace is “global warming” (a/k/a climate change). Do you believe them?

Yes, there are catastrophes that occur around the world that cause death, injury, and destruction to innocent people, and that has been going on since recorded history, even before the use of fossil fuels. Mother Nature is responsible, not man for these climate Armageddons, so how can man control Mother Nature?

Realistically, can these “doom and gloom” climate change agitators prove that they can prevent tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, droughts, floods and a host of other dire happenings that occur every year somewhere around the world?

What's amazing is that if you question these “chicken littles”, you are deemed an “evil” climate change denier, and in some cases, are deemed to be subject to criminal charges (ex: Sen. Sheldon Whiteside of Rhode Island, is proposing a bill to make “deniers” subject to R.I.C.O. Statutes). Can you imagine, so-called intelligent politicians (and citizens), who want to prosecute others who have a different view from theirs, are to be considered possible criminals? Is that a rational mindset?

Around the world today, we have Islamist terrorists cutting off heads, burning people alive, raping women and young girls etc. and those “global warming” fanatics claim that man-made global warming is the greatest threat to mankind today?

The data has shown that for the past 17 years we have been in a global cooling period, and that the disastrous consequences that they have predicted over the years were just erroneous speculation based on false emotion and not on scientific fact. Al Gore won a Nobel Prize for his movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”, but after close scrutiny, the film was discredited and deemed factually incorrect in many of its claims. Al Gore claimed that man-made global warming was “settled science”, but many highly reputable climatologists have debunked the theory put forth by Al Gore and other climate change alarmists. Some prominent “deniers” are Dr. Richard Lindzen, meteorologist and Alfred P. Sloan professor of climatology at M.I.T. ; Dr. Timothy Ball, former meteorology professor at the Univ. of Winnipeg; and John Coleman, meteorologist and founder of the “Weather Channel” who has called the theory of man-made global warming “the biggest scientific scam in history”. Should those prominent scientists be subject to criminal charges because they question the man-made global warming theory? Might that not go against the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?

So, when our leaders claim that “climate change” is the greatest threat to civilization, you have to wonder about their mental states. As the old saying goes, “You can't fool Mother Nature”, overrides any claim that man can change the environment other than by keeping it clean and free of debris.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann







Bookmark and Share