Sunday, September 14, 2014

MORT's meanderings

Are you up for a little experiment?
Call me slightly Islamophobic but here's something I think should be tried: Starting with Barack Hussein Obama, I believe that everyone with a Muslim name who is involved in any way in our Federal Government, should be yanked out by their roots and all security clearances revoked like, at once.
I'd like to see them all sent to Qatar for a period of one year, following the 5-4-1 prisoner swap precedent that was recently established by this president.  They should all be housed in and restricted to, a tent city that is surrounded by four rows of razor-wire at least 16 ft. high. They should be fed three squares a day, consisting solely of pig-by products. And, the only reading matter permitted should be signed copies of Hillary's new book.
At the end of their year in beautiful, idyllic Qatar, they should be transported directly to Nigeria, with no intermediate stops.  They should be set free to roam and sight-see on their own, without passports or identification of any sort; with no weapons except for Obama's golf clubs; no cell phones; and with no means of sustenance or humanitarian assistance of any kind.
Let them become charges of the kinder, gentler Nigerian Tyrant-in-Chief and let them be free to practice the 'religion of peace' as they will. Let's see how that goes for a while.
Here comes the 'experiment' part - Let's watch to see if our Government can survive without the benefits of being educated and informed by the genius beliefs & teachings of the Muslim Brotherhood including, Shariah.
Let's see if our military, the CIA, the FBI and all the other departments and agencies that have been polluted by Islamist indoctrination, can actually  exist and survive without the heretofore un-needed rations of horse-shit.  Let's try it for 4 years - okay?

MORT KUFF  © 6-16-2014

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, September 11, 2014

Is the “Politics of Personal Destruction” Alive and Well in the U.S.A.?

They say that politics is a “full contact sport” and that if you can't stand the heat, then get out of the kitchen, but is trying to ruin another person's reputation and life for partisan political purposes really acceptable, morally, in our society?  

The answer should be a resounding “NO”, as it is an abuse of the 1st Amendment of guaranteed free speech.  No, it is not against the law to “bad mouth” someone else (including a political opponent), but if what is said about that other person is false, demeaning, and personally damaging to that person's reputation and good name, it is morally wrong, that is, if we have any moral indignation left anymore.

This trashing of another person, especially in politics, seems to be practiced more by the liberal left than by the conservative right (just what the late radical author of “Rules for Radicals”, Saul Alinsky advocated).  Since the 1990's, the knives have been out and the “politics of personal destruction” has been in full force by the left in trying to shut down dissent on the part of people and candidates on the right.  It all started by the “verbal lynching” of the late jurist Robert Bork and, then, Supreme Court nominee, Clarence Thomas in his confirmation hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee.  In the Thomas case, some tawdry sexual allegations were presented by a former colleague to try to besmirch his reputation and thereby hoping to have him drop out of the confirmation process.  It did not work, he was confirmed, but the bogus charges are still brought up on occasion to discredit him and his decisions on the Supreme Court.  Besides Clarence Thomas, there has been a whole list of political opponents of the “right” who have come into their cross hairs and have been made part of the left's “politics of personal destruction”.  Here's a list of the other victims of this immoral practice of personal vilification.

  • Newt Gingrich
  • Herman Cain
  • Allen West
  • Chris Christie
  • Sarah Palin
  • Tom DeLay
  • Rick Scott
  • Dinesh D'Souza
  • Rick Perry
  • Scott Walker
  • Mitt Romney  etc. etc.

The charges against all of the above were baseless or were exaggerations of policy disputes that were turned into personal attacks, using innuendo and untruths to damage the reputations of those people for partisan political gains.

In addition, look at how the “hated” IRS has been used by politicians (Democrats) to harass and hurt people and groups who were political opponents.  All this under the guise of an Administration that was supposed to be open and fair to all sectors of our society.  The word “transparent” was mentioned over and over again by Obama and his campaign flunky's.  It looks like the “modus operandi” of how politics is run in the City of Chicago has been attempted in Wash. D.C., with Obama at the helm leading the charge.

Since the Democrats are expected, as of now, to be big losers in the off-year elections this coming November, you'll probably see a ramping up of the “politics of personal destruction”, by the Democrats, to try to rev up their base and the “low information” voters, in an attempt to try to impugn the integrity of their opponents in order to garner votes (Saul Alinsky must be smiling in his grave?).  Let's hope their efforts fail.  Throw the rascals out this coming November.  VOTE!

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, September 7, 2014

Bad Day at Black Rock, Period!

Not one day goes by without being constantly exposed to the President's
gas bagging on television, about one thing or another. When I have gas, I
usually blow it out the other end.

When he ends a statements with "PERIOD", run for cover, because what
precedes it is always a lie that leaves an obnoxious odor, reeking with
costly consequences on the tax payers, to meet the burden he places on them.
Anytime he opens his mouth, his talk is never cheap.

President Obama and his gang of incompetents act like they own the country,
and they can do anything they want with it. Until the mid term elections
and 2016, he owns the deck and the cards are stacked against Conservatives
and Republicans. His administration is under the protection of the ultra
liberal racist Justice Department, run by Attorney General Eric Holder.
We are the one-armed stranger depicted in, "Bad Day at Black Rock,"
confronting an evil town.

Being thwarted in every attempt to get to the truth about Benghazi; the IRS
and the dog ate all their emails excuse scandal; Fast and Furious, misuse
of the NSA; the VA debacle; freeing five of the most notorious terrorists
for one deserter; Opening the door at our southern border to thousands of
children and pregnant women to enter the country uncontested, due to Obama's
executive orders on immigration for political, not humanitarian reason.
His expertise on military knowledge botched up a win in Iraq that is turning
into a loss, because he offered no concrete exit plan.

Secretary of State John Kerry made an asinine statement ,that global warming
was the number one threat to the world, when his number one concern should
be working against the threat of terrorism. We, the legal citizens in this
country, should care about the political climate changes in the form of
scandals, blunders and cover-ups being made by the Obama administration,
while they try to defend the indefensible with a, in your face snow job.

I pray for that day when the only sentence I want to hear from this President
is, "GOOD BYE", and I will put the "PERIOD!" at the end of it.

Conservative article from George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, September 4, 2014

MORT's meanderings

    Sticks & stones may break my bones
    but, 'Hate Speech' could land me in jail.

President Barack Hussein Obama is on the warpath against anyone who uses 'Hate Speech'.  That is, anyone who dares to write or speak out in opposition to his 'Go-It-Alone' manner of conducting the nation's business while simultaneously, advancing his own, personal agenda -  the niggling tenets of The Constitution be damned.  (Note for those who are literacy-deprived, the word 'niggling' means - bothersome or persistent in a tiresome way - it has nothing to do with race.  Just so's you know.)
This goes double for anyone who uses the Social Media to express their displeasure with President Obama's royal heavy-handedness.  To his way of thinking this is by far, more unAmerican than any threat to this nation posed by the Islamic State of Imbecilic Lunatics (ISIL).  Beheadings pale by comparison to 'Hate Speech' as defined by Messrs. Obama & Holder, the arbiters of proper and 'We'll decide what's legal', state-approved language.
We are a nation of laws, not men.  Except, when certain men, who are temporarily in positions of political power, decide to take the law into their own hands and determine which laws to enforce and which to ignore.  Repression of 'Freedom of Speech' heads  the list of priorities of this Administration's 'certain men'.    
After all, that First Amendment to The Constitution 'thingee', was a totally outmoded concept when the authors of that document penned it.  They wrote that as their most urgent concern in the immediate aftermath of  their successful American Revolution conducted against the enforcers of King George III of England's  tyranny.  Following in the mode of kindly 'ol King George III, King Obama the First, also hates free speech.
One hopes that after all these years, the authors of The Constitution might be excused for their mental state when they wrote about 'Freedom of Speech'.  Obviously, they were still a bit overwrought with emotion from their efforts to free themselves from the King's tyranny.  One is hopeful too, that King Obama the First, might deign to tolerate those few of us latter-day 'Revolutionaries' who still have similar thoughts about, 'Freedom of Speech'.      He might just think of it as granting us a 'Mulligan' -
don'tcha know.  Yeah, that's it - a 'Mulligan'.

MORT KUFF   © 8-29-2014

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, August 31, 2014

What's Behind the Policy Decisions of President Obama?

Being one of the most secretive presidents of all time, what is behind the policies and actions that President Obama has championed during his public career? He has spent millions of dollars to keep many of his records closed to scrutiny by an (un)inquiring press and a gaggle of Zombies who support him by not questioning anything he says or does.  

What shaped his thinking as he has gone through life?  Well, let's take a look at what we do know.  His immediate family (including his mostly absent father), his mother and grandparents were all left-leaning Socialists.  As a teenager in Hawaii, he was taken under the wing of Frank Marshall Davis, an admitted Communist and Obama's self-admitted mentor during his teen years.  At Occidental College and Columbia University, he paled around with professed radical students and faculty.  When he went to Chicago, after graduating from that bastion of liberal thought, Harvard University, to become a Community Organizer, he came under the tutelage of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, an admitted radical Socialist and a Black Liberation preacher who introduced him to the political machine in Chicago.  To get his start in politics, he was introduced, in their living room, by admitted domestic terrorists Bill Ayers and his wife Bernadette Dohrn.  It could and should be concluded, therefore, that his career was overwhelmingly exposed to the Marxist/Socialist philosophy of those people, and in addition, he latched onto the writings of the “Father of Community Organizing”, Saul Alinsky.  In fact, as a lecturer at the University of Chicago law school, one of the courses he taught was the writings of Alinsky called, “Rules for Radicals”.

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Obama proclaimed that he was going to “fundamentally change” America.  After almost 6 years since he first became president, what part of Alinsky's “Rules for Radicals” has Obama tried to implement to make us into a “social state” (a/k/a Socialism)?

According to Alinsky, there are 8 levels of control that must be in place to accomplish the “transformation of America”.  Here's what Alinsky said must be done:

          1. Control healthcare – if you control healthcare (Obamacare) you control the people.
    1. Poverty – increase the poverty level so it is easier to control the masses by providing most everything for them to live by providing government handouts.
    2. Debt – increase the debt to unsustainable levels thereby increasing taxes which will produce more poverty. (our national debt is now approaching $18 trillion).
    3. Gun control – remove the ability of the citizens to defend themselves against the government, which might then eventually lead to a police state.
    4. Welfare – take control of every aspect of their lives, food (food stamps), housing (Section 8 and sub-prime mortgages), and income.
    5. Education- get students in school and indoctrinate them and you'll probably get them to be followers for life.
    6. Religion- remove God from most all aspects of life, because a Godless society is easier to control.
    7. Class warfare- create envy between rich and poor because you can then overtax the rich because there are more poor people than there are rich people to vote for these taxes.

Do these 8 levels of control, advocated by Alinsky, seem to be part of Obama's policies for his “total transformation” of America?

Since we have a little over 2 years left of the Obama presidency, the only way to slowdown this assault on our representative democracy is to vote out his enablers in the Congress and Senate this November. Vote Republican this November for the good of our country.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Ferguson and the Real Race War

We have a Youtube Video from Bill Whittle, the conservative blogger and political commentator. He takes on the subject of the shooting of Michael Brown by a policeman whom the MSM loudly scream is white. The results are the ensuing riots and looting in Ferguson, MO by some very violent and greedy People.

Americans have been told, yet again by the lame stream media, that there is an epidemic of crime against black people in this country. But is there really a race war, and if so, which side is actually waging it?

Artwork by MORT KUFF

Bookmark and Share