Sunday, May 29, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

       Mate’s lives matter.
For those of us who are married . . . and who among us is not? . . . I am here to inform you that, ‘Mate’s lives matter’.  You can take that to the bank . . . or not.
Without the sacred institution of marriage, much of the trauma, suffering, pain, aggravation, deprivation, consternation, pent-up anger, frustration, confusion and the shock & awe of the ‘Light & Sound Show’ would be missing from our lives. How on Earth could our wives get through the day without pointing to our teensiest, tiny flaws, including some of our more gross habits that are peculiar to the males of our species?
We few, we brave & courageous few . . . we men, are to blame of course.  Wasn’t it we (us) who put these dames on a pedestal way back when?  Yep, it was we (us) who looked at their Mother’s and despite what we saw and despite what our logical minds told us, thought the comely young gazelles whom we chose to woo, couldn’t ever, no not never, turn out to be like their Mommies.  What this proves is that sexual urge trumps any and all male logic.
Look here Friend, I’m not a mean person and it is not my objective to cast aspersions willy-nilly at all wives. Some of my best friends’ wives are okay. Or at least, that’s how they seem.  But, when one listens to some of one’s best friends – and one reads between the lines and notices the tiny beads of perspiration on the foreheads of one’s friends as they speak of their wives, in private of course - - one begins to comprehend the width & depth of the vast unexpressed problems being dealt with by one’s friends.  Astonishing.
It boils down to a better understanding that wives really do realize that their ‘Mate’s lives matter’.  They know damned well what life would be like for them if they were deprived of their opportunity to hurl cruel criticism at whatzisname 24/7, to play “Harpy-for-a-Day’ with cutting remarks, to feign hearing loss when Hubby comes home from a hard day working in the Salt Mines - and to let him know just how miserably he fails when compared to the Man-of-the-House next door.  Yadda, yadda, yadda!
Well, I’m not the brightest bulb in the chandelier but I know when I’m well off.  Make that, ‘dumb lucky’.  I never go to the local Pub to complain that my wife doesn’t understand me because, she does.  What’s more, I’m deathly afraid of the woman.
Come to think of it . . . ALL MATE’S LIVES MATTER.            (Even those of Wives)

                  MORT KUFF   © 5-28-2016

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 26, 2016

What is Cranial Rectal Inversion?

Cranial Rectal Inversion (CRI) is a malady (disease) that is mostly contracted by liberals who have their heads so firmly planted up their butts, it is unlikely that they'll ever have another rational point-of-view. It is in most cases, incurable, and they can transfer it to other liberals whom they intermingle with.

The symptoms are very numerous, but I'll try to enumerate the ideas and policies associated with this malady, which causes them and their fellow liberals to be afflicted with this disease.

First off,. The liberals that are infected are in favor of, open borders and giving amnesty to illegal aliens, the more the better; they favor taking money from the rich and giving handouts to the poor ( free stuff); they favor unfettered abortion up till the time of breech (in other words, late-term abortion); they call Wall Street “evil” while taking in millions of dollars in campaign contributions from those very same financial institutions; they believe in same sex marriage and gender neutral bathrooms and shower rooms; they believe in appeasing our avowed enemies while “dissing” our friends ( like Israel); they want to take away the firearms of law abiding citizens while they release thousands of criminals from our jails and prisons; and they turn a blind eye on the corrupt activities of the Clinton's (ex: the Clinton “Crime” Foundation) and their loyal cronies (a/k/a liberals, Progressives, Democrats, and Socialists).

There are many more symptoms as to why the liberals are infected with CRI, but we don't have time or space to enumerate them all. You could say that they have their heads so far up their butts, they can chew their food on the way down, to add to the earlier definition at the beginning of this Pulitzer prize winning editorial (there's no conceit in my family, I have it all).

The cases of CRI sort of escalate generally around the time of an election period. To try to counteract this malady, they (the Democrats) trot out the usual verbal garbage their sleazy focus groups tell them to use to try to slime their opponents (the Republicans) as it has worked in the past. They say Republicans are anti-woman; anti-black; anti-Hispanic; anti-poor; anti-abortion; anti-gays, lesbians, and the new favored class, transgenders (which make up ½ of one-percent of the population) etc. , but it doesn't seem to help them get cured, in fact, it makes their condition much worse.

Just listen to the campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, both of whom have advanced cases of CRI, and it gets worse each and every week they campaign. Whoever gets the Democrat nomination (most likely Hillary, if she doesn't get indicted in the meantime), their cases of CRI will be non-reversible and they will have to bear the agony of being terminally irrelevant, much to the chagrin of Barack Hussein Obama and Debbie Wasserman-Schmutz (her real name in Yiddish).

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 22, 2016

Like Two Pees in a Powder Room

Can we add perversion to Obama's latest fiat about whose space can be invaded
for transgender rights, to pee and shower to match their gender identity? I thought
gender is defined not by emotion, but by our difference in body plumbing and
the part one plays toward procreation. His decree is forcing the majority of people
to forfeit their right to privacy and moral belief to a minuscule proportion of
individuals who may be victims of a freak of nature.

President Obama's daughters will not be exposed to male genitalia in a private school
setting, but the rest of our children attending public education facilities will be if
this blackmail is allowed; obey or lose federal funding.

The liberal mind logic is to destroy the traditional instead of fixing the problem.
Tear down the whole building to fix a leaking faucet.

The whole Obama administration has functioned under this premise of catering to
the few at the detriment and expense of the many.

It will be interesting to see how a lesbian will maneuver a urinal in the men's room
and toilet seats nailed down.

You can be sure the "Political Correct Police" will try to disarm my words by labeling
me homophobic, bigoted and racist, to obliterate my space and my right of expression.

Conservative column from George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Is it Fair to Call Hillary Clinton “Crooked”?

Republican nominee Donald Trump has given Hillary Clinton a new “moniker”, it is the adjective “crooked”. The definition of “crooked” is a person being dishonest, evasive, or illegal. Does it apply to the persona of Hillary Clinton or is it an unfair designation?

Hillary Clinton has been in the political arena for over 25 years and has been the subject of scorn as well as idolatry. It depends on which side of the political spectrum you reside on.

Let's take a look at what has been her history.

Hillary attended Wellesley College and graduated in 1969. As part of her senior thesis, her theme was a positive critique of the works of Saul Alinsky, the author of the radical book entitled, “Rules for Radicals”. Alinsky is known as the father of the public policy of community organizing. Ironically, Pres. Obama also was a disciple of Alinsky and actually taught a class at the Univ. of Chicago on the methods espoused by Alinsky.

After she graduated from Yale Law School in 1973, she went to work for the Chief Counsel of the Senate Watergate Committee, Jerome Zeifman, a Democrat. During her tenure, Zeifman fired her for lying and being unethical. In Zeifman's 2006 book, “Hillary's Pursuit of Power”, Zeifman wrote, “Hillary is unfit to be Senator or President, the last vestiges of the traditional moral authority of the party of Roosevelt, Truman, and Johnson will be destroyed”. Also in the mid-90's, noted N.Y. Times columnist, William Safire, called her a “congenital liar”. You could say that those comments about Hillary Clinton were not a ringing endorsement of her character.

From her marriage to Bill Clinton to the present day, she and her husband have been in the center of one scandal after another, but to be honest, they have avoided, up until the present, to not be held liable for most of the charges leveled against them. They have been labeled the “teflon couple” by being able to avoid most legal sanctions including Bill's impeachment, but he was assessed an $850,000 settlement to one of his female accusers, Paula Jones.

The list of scandals that have confronted Hillary and her husband have dogged them ever since their days in Arkansas up till their days in the White House and since, up until today.

Here's a list of some of the nefarious dealings of Hillary and her husband. She claimed back in the 1980's in Arkansas that she was able to turn a $1,000 investment in cattle futures into a $100,000 windfall by reading the Wall Street Journal (it was latter found out that one of Bill Clinton's political cronies did this hanky-panky deal for her as a political favor). While in the White House, she was involved in the “Travelgate” affair (firing, without cause, the people in the presidential travel office to install political cronies); as the person in charge of getting Universal Heath Care, she had secret meetings and in the end, failed to receive any support from either Democrats or Republicans; as her husband was being accused of sexual abuse of women, she was placed in charge of “bimbo eruptions” and tasked to keep these women accusers quiet by smearing them and by intimidation; as a Senate candidate in 2000, she was accused of working with her husband to grant pardons to some Hasidic Jews in New Square, N.Y. For their support for her candidacy in the N.Y. Senate race (the village voted 1,400 to 12 for Hillary, even though the Hasidic community voted Republican overwhelmingly in the past).

As Secretary of State, the scandals continued apace. It has been claimed that there was a “quid pro quo” with her husband's enormous speaking fees and donations to the Clinton Foundation, which resulted in favorable decisions to the donors from Hillary's State Dep't. The straw that broke the camels back was her blatant lying about the murders of 4 Americans in Benghazi (including our Ambassador, Chris Stevens). She, and other Obama Administration spokespeople claimed that the attack on the U.S. compound was because of an inflammatory anti-Islam video, which we now know was a bogus claim. As Hillary has shown, in a message to her daughter on the evening of Sep't. 12, that it was a pre-planned Al-Queda affiliate attack that had nothing to do with a video. She lied !

And finally, (although we could go on and on), her use of a private computer server to conduct official State Dep't. business, which she knew was illegal as she signed a document to that effect when she started as Secretary. She is now the subject of a criminal investigation by the F.B.I. We are now waiting for the F.B.I. report as to whether they will recommend that she be indicted.

With all these instances of the Clinton's dancing around the law for lo these many years, the label “crooked” seems to be a valid designation. What must be determined is whether character matters to the voters or will they overlook her indiscretions and elect her president. God help us if that happens.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 15, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

The ‘Bernie & Hillary’ Show.
Indulge me as I shall intentionally waste the time it takes to address the gullible loons who comprise the audiences that attend the ‘Bernie & Hillary’ show.  A game show with no surprises or prizes.
It is a conundrum wrapped in a quandary that is inexplicable – how and why so many otherwise seemingly ‘normal’ humans can be so seriously separated from their senses when it comes to slavishly following such oblivious Pied Pipers of Nonsense as Sanders & Clinton.  For anyone to listen attentively to these two for more than 60 seconds is to come to believe that you have lost your mind or your hearing – or both.
These two aliens from Space have one attribute in common - they are able to dispense a stream of tripe, hype, trivia & hogwash for hours on end, with no visible effort.  Apparently, it comes easy to them to drone on endlessly with faux emotion and enthusiasm that is manufactured on-demand.
They make one begin to think in terms of ‘Term Limits’ – not merely for elected office holders but, for certain human lives on this Earth.  I for one, would not miss either Bern or Hill if they were to show up missing for the next 3 or more generations.
Hark!  What is that ruckus I hear in the wings?  Oh, oh.  It’s Biden, Bloomberg and AlGore warming-over their failures -  just in case.  Let’s hear it for the Democrat Partythey never fail to disappoint.

MORT KUFF     © 2-13-2016

The Donald: What Bill Whittle Loves About Donald Trump
Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Is Global Warming the Greatest Threat to the Free World?

To listen to Pres. Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Bernie Sanders and others in the political hierarchy, you'd think that the greatest threat to world peace is “global warming” (a/k/a climate change). Do you believe them?

Yes, there are catastrophes that occur around the world that cause death, injury, and destruction to innocent people, and that has been going on since recorded history, even before the use of fossil fuels. Mother Nature is responsible, not man for these climate Armageddons, so how can man control Mother Nature?

Realistically, can these “doom and gloom” climate change agitators prove that they can prevent tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, droughts, floods and a host of other dire happenings that occur every year somewhere around the world?

What's amazing is that if you question these “chicken littles”, you are deemed an “evil” climate change denier, and in some cases, are deemed to be subject to criminal charges (ex: Sen. Sheldon Whiteside of Rhode Island, is proposing a bill to make “deniers” subject to R.I.C.O. Statutes). Can you imagine, so-called intelligent politicians (and citizens), who want to prosecute others who have a different view from theirs, are to be considered possible criminals? Is that a rational mindset?

Around the world today, we have Islamist terrorists cutting off heads, burning people alive, raping women and young girls etc. and those “global warming” fanatics claim that man-made global warming is the greatest threat to mankind today?

The data has shown that for the past 17 years we have been in a global cooling period, and that the disastrous consequences that they have predicted over the years were just erroneous speculation based on false emotion and not on scientific fact. Al Gore won a Nobel Prize for his movie, “An Inconvenient Truth”, but after close scrutiny, the film was discredited and deemed factually incorrect in many of its claims. Al Gore claimed that man-made global warming was “settled science”, but many highly reputable climatologists have debunked the theory put forth by Al Gore and other climate change alarmists. Some prominent “deniers” are Dr. Richard Lindzen, meteorologist and Alfred P. Sloan professor of climatology at M.I.T. ; Dr. Timothy Ball, former meteorology professor at the Univ. of Winnipeg; and John Coleman, meteorologist and founder of the “Weather Channel” who has called the theory of man-made global warming “the biggest scientific scam in history”. Should those prominent scientists be subject to criminal charges because they question the man-made global warming theory? Might that not go against the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?

So, when our leaders claim that “climate change” is the greatest threat to civilization, you have to wonder about their mental states. As the old saying goes, “You can't fool Mother Nature”, overrides any claim that man can change the environment other than by keeping it clean and free of debris.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 8, 2016

Erase the Blackboard and start with a clean slate

Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, is not and can never be a statesman, unless he changes his style. Coming from the same place, but for the difference being, his neighborhood had Estates added after Jamaica, I think I can comment accurately.

By spreading my wings, living in other parts of the country, I was able to shed the New York City metropolitan area gravitational pull of language and values that others find crass, pushy and obnoxious.

Local denizens try to cover it up with citing the handling of the Trade Center tragedy. Although heroic, it isn't unique to New Yorkers, but compassion that will and has been replicated in any city or town in America, when the people come together in humanitarian effort.

I hope Donald Trump will drop the childish way he conducted his primary campaign, that I presume was meant to reach the worm brain populous, living in "Watters World", and who are allowed to vote.

He will be facing Hillary Rodham Clinton, the presumptive Democrat nominee, who will be a formidable opponent, because of her similar questionable methods he uses in a dog fight. He in business; she in her self-serving gain.

As I was writing this opinion piece, John Kasich was suspending his bid to run for his party's nomination for president. From the original seventeen, I hadn't settled on any one choice; but after listening to Governor Kasich's suspending notification speech, Donald Trump will be doing well to take heed of this man whom he smeared for his eating habits, and try to emulate him for his eloquent manner by respecting this quality man.

Focus must be on the consequence that will befall the nation if hard nosed idiots stay home and not vote for Trump because they didn't get their way. Talking about childish. A spiteful myopic view is more than the presidency!It is keeping the majority in both houses, and most important, preventing a radical liberal supreme court that can change the face of America.

In spite of their short mindedness, these stay home pseudo conservative minded idiots are making a choice, even without voting, by handing it all, to whom they claim is their nemesis.

Populists and conservatives have to speak with one voice if they are to erase the last eight years and rebuilt our country to a kinder, gentler, safer and prosperous one.

Conservative column from George Giftos

Bookmark and Share

Thursday, May 5, 2016

Is Hillary Clinton the Great G.O.P. Unifier?

We can all agree that the state of the G.O.P. is presently in shambles (the Democrats are also facing similar problems) and it looks like, at present, the party will not come back to unify for the general election. But, one thing is in play that could bring some semblance of unity back to the G.O.P., and that is, Hillary Clinton. The question could then be asked, “Is Hillary Clinton the Great G.O.P. Unifier”? In other words, do the competing G.O.P. factions “hate” Hillary and the Democrats more than they “hate” Trump or Cruz. That's going to be the $64 question during the campaign season.

This has been a highly emotional campaign with the “establishment” at odds with both of the leading insurgent candidates representing the Republican Party. For whatever reason, the party “elite” do not like Trump or Cruz, but a silent revolution has taken place by the rank and file Republicans whereby they are rebelling against the “perceived” do-nothing hierarchy of the Republican Party. Many grass roots Republicans feel that the Republicans elected to the House and Senate, with a majority, have not held Obama's feet to the fire like they should have and that they have acquiesced to the Democrats on most main issues. They wonder why, with the Republicans winning big in 2010 and 2014 along with most of the state governorships, they couldn't or wouldn't halt the illegal actions of Pres. Obama?

Now, the two front-runners of the Republicans are, what you might call the “anti-establishment” types, and the RNC leaders seem to feel they are threatened. Rightfully or wrongfully, the different factions are at each others throats. Is there anything that could change this situation?

The one major factor, as I alluded to before, that could bring the different factions to their senses is the name, HILLARY CLINTON.

When push comes to shove, whoever the G.O.P. candidate is, Hillary might just be such a galvanizing figure as to bring the factions together for the good of the G.O.P. and the country as a whole.

Hillary Clinton is one of the most polarizing figures in politics today. She is looked upon by the citizenry as being a liar, being dishonest, and untrustworthy by over 60% of the population (a recent Quinnipiac poll). That includes not only Republicans, but a good percentage of Democrats also. She and she alone, could be the catalyst to bring common sense back to the Republican voters and others, in order to bring a Republican victory in November.

To the straight-thinking G.O.P. voters, a Hillary victory (if she is still the candidate after the F.B.I. gives its report to the Attorney General), would be a continuation of the failed policies of the Obama Administration. The policies that dominate Republican thinking such as bringing back jobs to the U.S., curtailing illegal immigration, nominating Supreme Court nominees, having a “fair” trade policy, and tax reform, will not be fulfilled or instituted by a Hillary Clinton Administration, which fancies itself as a clone of the European countries, economics and policies. So, both antagonists within the Republican Party might have to take a deep breath and vote for either Trump or Cruz ( at this writing it looks like Trump has the advantage).

So, in conclusion, I believe that common sense will take over and the vast majority of Republican, Independent, and conservative Democrat voters will join together and vote for change to “Make America Great Again”, and that means voting for the Republican candidate. When that happens we all could thank Hillary for being the great unifier of the Republican Party.

Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann

Bookmark and Share

Sunday, May 1, 2016

MORT’s meanderings

The word ‘Terrorism’ is banned from use by the Public Relations geniuses in the State Department. There are other ‘unacceptable’ words that have been banned by the deniers in our Federal Government.  This president won’t  utter the words, ‘Militant or Radical Islam’.  His very own Teleprompter is prohibited from showing them.  WHY?

What is wrong with these Obama-banned words that we are told, are now ‘unacceptable’ words?  Why are they banned?  Who gave Obama the right to exercise his personal control over the universal English language that this nation and the Western world use to communicate freely just as they have for hundreds and hundreds of years?  Who gave him the authority to redefine words as he has done continually since the day he falsely swore to ‘protect and defend we the people and The Constitution of The United States of America? The fact that he has the unusual faculty of being able to talk out of both sides of his mouth does not confer upon him the right to diddle with our spoken language.
As a native born, legal & legitimate citizen who has worn the uniform in defense of this country during wartime – none of which this president can claim and actually prove, I do   believe that I have far more right than he does, to ban the use of words that I consider to be ‘unacceptable words’ or ‘undeserved titles’.  So, here’s a partial list of the words I have herewith, banned from use:
President.  Commander-in-Chief.  Secretary of State.  Ambassador.  Homeland Security. Democrat. Liberal. Progressive. Reid.  Pelosi.  Schumer. Hillary. Clinton. EPA.  TSI. Michelle. Madame Supreme Court Justice.  IRS. NSA. All female Department and U. S. Agency heads. (Yes, I said it.)  The names of all Muslim advisors in this administration – every single one.   The names of Jessie Jackson, Louis Ferry-can and Al Sharptongue. Black lives matter.  Infidel. Mastermind.  Workplace violence.  All Obama sicko-phants whether in or out of Congress. Entitlement.  Foreign Aid.  Immigrant.  These aren’t all but, they’re a start.
                                                                                 MORT KUFF  © 11-23-2015

Bookmark and Share