They
say that politics is a “full contact sport” and that if you can't stand
the heat, then get out of the kitchen, but is trying to ruin another
person's reputation and life for partisan political purposes really
acceptable, morally, in our society?
The answer should be a resounding “NO”, as it is an abuse of the 1st
Amendment of guaranteed free speech. No, it is not against the law to
“bad mouth” someone else (including a political opponent), but if what
is said about that other person is false, demeaning, and personally
damaging to that person's reputation and good name, it is morally wrong,
that is, if we have any moral indignation left anymore.
This
trashing of another person, especially in politics, seems to be
practiced more by the liberal left than by the conservative right (just
what the late radical author of “Rules for Radicals”, Saul Alinsky
advocated). Since the 1990's, the knives have been out and the
“politics of personal destruction” has been in full force by the left in
trying to shut down dissent on the part of people and candidates on the
right. It all started by the “verbal lynching” of the late jurist
Robert Bork and, then, Supreme Court nominee, Clarence Thomas in his
confirmation hearings in the Senate Judiciary Committee. In the Thomas
case, some tawdry sexual allegations were presented by a former
colleague to try to besmirch his reputation and thereby hoping to have
him drop out of the confirmation process. It did not work, he was
confirmed, but the bogus charges are still brought up on occasion to
discredit him and his decisions on the Supreme Court. Besides Clarence
Thomas, there has been a whole list of political opponents of the
“right” who have come into their cross hairs and have been made part of
the left's “politics of personal destruction”. Here's a list of the
other victims of this immoral practice of personal vilification.
-
Newt Gingrich
-
Herman Cain
-
Allen West
-
Chris Christie
-
Sarah Palin
-
Tom DeLay
-
Rick Scott
-
Dinesh D'Souza
-
Rick Perry
-
Scott Walker
-
Mitt Romney etc. etc.
The
charges against all of the above were baseless or were exaggerations of
policy disputes that were turned into personal attacks, using innuendo
and untruths to damage the reputations of those people for partisan
political gains.
In
addition, look at how the “hated” IRS has been used by politicians
(Democrats) to harass and hurt people and groups who were political
opponents. All this under the guise of an Administration that was
supposed to be open and fair to all sectors of our society. The word
“transparent” was mentioned over and over again by Obama and his
campaign flunky's. It looks like the “modus operandi” of how politics
is run in the City of Chicago has been attempted in Wash. D.C., with
Obama at the helm leading the charge.
Since
the Democrats are expected, as of now, to be big losers in the off-year
elections this coming November, you'll probably see a ramping up of the
“politics of personal destruction”, by the Democrats, to try to rev up
their base and the “low information” voters, in an attempt to try to
impugn the integrity of their opponents in order to garner votes (Saul
Alinsky must be smiling in his grave?). Let's hope their efforts fail.
Throw the rascals out this coming November. VOTE!
Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
1 comment:
The two egregious bomb-throwers of the Democratic Party, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, use this tactic as part of their modus operandi. They can't defend the inane policies of Obama, so they lash out to personally destroy their Republican opponents by making vicious charges and then hiding behind their positions in the Congress. Every person has a right to be stupid, but these two loons abuse the privilege.
Post a Comment