So, if you disagree with another person or express a negative opinion of another person or group, you become a prime target as being called a “bigot”, especially if you are a Republican or a Conservative. That term “bigot”, along with the term “racist”, is used by liberals to alter the dialogue when a clash of ideas and opinions are being debated. That is the “modus operandi” of the far-left when they can't argue the facts, and back up their positions on the issues, especially when the debate is about race or religion.
The biggest practitioner of this labeling is none other than our “Liar in Chief”, Barack Hussein Obama. In his many comments about race and religion, he has blamed others, mostly Republicans, of engaging in hate speech because they protest the actions of certain groups relating to race and religion. It seems, no matter what the situation is, when it comes to race or religion, he always takes the sides of the blacks (or other minorities) and the Muslims (to the exclusion of all other religions). Pres. Obama was supposed to be a “uniter” not a “divider” when he first ran for office. Well, how has that worked out so far? We are more divided, as a nation, than ever before.
The designation of the terms “bigot” and “racist” are becoming so hackneyed that it is like the boy who cried “wolf” too often, that he wasn't taken seriously when a true dire situation arose. Those over-used words are used to end all conversations about race and religion as many people are shut down and shut up as they they don't want to be labeled with those terms, in that regard the far-left has succeeded in their mission. The term “political correctness” has been popularized as a result of this concerted effort to stifle “free speech”.
Look at what our Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, has proclaimed after the San Bernardino shootings occurred, and the attackers were identified as Muslim terrorists. She said that the U.S. Justice Department would “take action” when anti-Islamic speech “edges towards violence when we see the potential to lift....that mantle of anti-Muslim rhetoric”. Is she, and other bureaucrats, going to be the arbiters of what is or is not inflammatory speech? Does she not believe in the 1st Amendment?
After the 9/11 terror attacks by militant terrorist Muslims, there was no wide-scale violence against Muslims, even though the terrorists were all Muslims. The most recent statistics show that anti-Semitism is a far bigger problem than anti-Islamic bias in this country. The statistics show that 60% of biased acts reported were perpetrated against Jews, and only 13% targeted Muslims. So why does Pres. Obama keep up the drumbeat about Islamophobia when there is little of any widespread animosity and hateful actions against Muslims? Does he have an agenda?
People are fearful, and rightly so, about the lives of their families and neighbors who are potential victims of these ruthless, demented, and fanatical terrorists, who most often happen to be Muslims. Yes, most Muslims are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim and we shouldn't be called “bigots” or “racists” in expressing our concerns that the San Bernardino massacre will be only the beginning of other Muslim terrorist attacks against our citizens and our country. The terrorists have said so, and we would be fools if we didn't take their threats to heart. Should we be labeled a “bigot” or a “racist” for pointing that out? Hitler laid out his plans in his book “Mein Kampf”, but the free world sloughed off his boastings as the rants of a fool, and look what happened. These militant Islamic terrorists have stated that they want the world to be a universal Caliphate, with them in control. Should we be sheep being led to slaughter because we might be called a “bigot” or a “racist”? Only a fool would settle for that scenario. Speak up America, and don't let “political correctness” keep us from telling the truth. Our lives and our country is at stake. Speak up !
Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
4 comments:
The pollution in our country isn't climate change. It is the 7 plus years of Obama contamination and PC, responsible for misused terminologies. It is evident Loretta Lynn isn't saving us from the real bigotry and racism of Eric Holder.
We must set aside our uncontrolled anger and guard against being duped by meaningless rhetoric, sounding tough with no teeth. Evaluating our
replacement choice for President, our top priority should be to pick the one who will appoint a Justice of the Supreme Court that won't be another deceptive surprise. The one who will fill the court with justices who will uphold our traditions and Judeo-Christian principals.
A bigot is anyone who disagrees with a liberal. In order to avoid this designation you must be in favor of gay marriage, abortion up till the time of breech, taking the guns away from law abiding citizens, being in favor of drug legalization, believe in the phony theory of global warming, that every man is guilty of sexual abuse (except Bill Clinton) until proven innocent, of accepting into the country anyone without proper vetting, and you must believe that Hillary Clinton is telling the truth. Deviate from any of these positions and you are a candidate for being called a bigot. Welcome to the club.
Its interesting how Mr. Lehmann thinks. Through run unsolicited series of emails I found out exactly how Mr Lehmann thinks. Mr. Klein commented that a bigot is anyone who disagrees with a liberal. Mr. Klein you might want to consider expanding your definition to include anybody who disagrees with Mr. Lehmann.
I agree with 995 of what this Chuck Dude says. I have to ask why don't more People point out how the Democrat Party is the Party of Bigots now. This current regime despises Israel and look at what the MSM, aka Democrat Brownshirts do to Hispanics, calling them monkeys. Look how the Democrat Bigot Party treat working class White people. They won't even say White Lives matter, only #BlackLivesMatter.
Post a Comment