* How can sane people not think that our President, Barack Hussein Obama, was not a principal player in all the scandals surrounding the White Hose such as; Fast & Furious, the IRS auditing and harassing of conservative groups, the spying on AP and Fox reporters e-mails and phone logs, and the cover-up of the Benghazi murders? Isn’t the circumstantial evidence overwhelming? Was Liberace gay?
* Why is there such a push to legitimatize the “gay” lifestyle as if they are the only group who has faced discrimination, both real or imagined? Are they really seeking tolerance or are they really seeking approval and justification of their promiscuous lifestyle as being normal?
* Why are people who advocate for smaller government and less government spending, a fairer tax system for all classes, adhering to the U.S. Constitution, repealing that monstrosity called Obamacare, and upholding the 1st and 2nd Amendments, considered to be un-American and enemies of the country (Re: Tea Party advocates and sympathizers)?
* Conversely, why do people (mostly liberals and progressives) who demonstrate and violate our laws (Occupy Wall Street) considered to be upstanding citizens just for voicing their opinions just like the Tea Party people? Is there a “double standard”? Is Michael Moore fat and ugly?
* Why do the powers-to-be in Wash. D.C., continue to throw roadblocks in the way of our country exploiting our own vast natural resources of natural gas, oil, and clean-burning coal, so that we can become completely energy independent, so that we don’t have to buy energy from countries who are our enemies, and who don’t like us?
* Why do Democrats want to make it easier for ineligible people to vote in our elections by being against simple voter I.D. laws, and by easing the requirements for non-legal people to vote? Could it be because most all these ineligible voters vote Democratic? Does Nancy Pelosi use Botox?
* Why don’t we have a contest as to who contributes more to society - Muslims or Jews? Let’s compare which side has the most hospitals and doctors, the most museums, the most Nobel prizes in science and technology, the most charitable organizations that actually help the poor, the most opera, symphonies, and ballet companies? I guess that wouldn’t be a fair contest, would it?
* Why is Islam considered a “peaceful” religion when the writings in the Koran condone mercy killings in families, the cutting off of limbs for petty crimes, for the stoning of women to death for adultery, the arrangement of marriages by grown men to pre-pubescent girls, the practice of “taquiyya” whereby the lying to a non-Muslim is looked upon favorably, and encouraging “jihad” around the world in the quest by Islam for total domination? Instead of being called a religion of peace, it should be considered a “theocratic political ideology” that wants to convert and enslave all non-Muslims.
Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
1 comment:
Nobody asked me, but why do the liberals keep calling Islam a religion of "peace" when its holy book condones the following actions; stoning to death of women accused of adultery; hanging of homosexuals; arranged marriages of adult men with pre-pubescent girls; women are considered inferior to men; women's testimony is worth half that of a man; a Muslim is encouraged to lie to an infidel if the lie furthers the cause of Islam etc., etc.? Other religions in the past have had in their texts some violent passages, but in the modern times those acts are not practiced, but not so with Muslims. Peaceful religion my foot. As Chuck once wrote, Islam is not a religion, it is a "Theocratic political ideology" that wants to take over the world and to impose Sharia Law on everyone, so stop the politically correct nonsense of calling Islam a religion of peace.
Post a Comment