The vile, untruthful adjectives used to denigrate the Tea Party sympathizers include the following - fascists, racists, gun-toting, red-neck, homophobes etc. all without merit or cognitive evidence to support those slurs. It seems the liberals are so frustrated by the fact that the Tea Party people were so successful in the 2010 elections, that they must now be brought down, come hell or high water. The truth has nothing to do with it - it has everything to do with the Democrats trying to regain power in both the executive and legislative branches of government. The “end does justify the means” is their modus operandi.
In order to try to combat the excitement that the Tea Party brought to the political process, the far-left liberals, which include most unions and radical political groups (ex: Communist Party U.S.A., Democratic Socialists of America, S.E.I.U., and ACORN (which has changed its name), organized a counter to the Tea Party called, “Occupy Wall Street”. All the negative descriptions that were attached to the Tea Party by the liberals, could've and should've been attached to the “occupy” protesters, but the media never equated the excesses of decorum and civil disruption to them as they did, falsely, to the Tea Party. The double-standard used by the media was quite obvious.
The leaders of the Democrat Party, President Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi etc., all heaped glowing praise for the rag-tag, Marxist/Socialist group of “Occupy” protesters, but ignored the violence, the anti-Semitism, the anti-American rhetoric and destructive actions that permeated most all the “Occupy” protests across the country.
The Tea Party and its adherents were chosen by the liberal left (and the Obama political machine) as scapegoats because they represented a threat to the chance of the Democrats holding on to the White House and the Senate come this November.
The Democrats cannot run on the “accomplishments” of the Obama presidency, so they must divert attention away from the obvious (Obama's failures), and concentrate on destroying, personally, the Tea Party and the Republican nominee. This is right out of the Saul Alinsky playbook as he wrote in his book, “Rules for Radicals” back in the 1970's.
Make no mistake, this presidential election will be the “dirtiest” in modern history. With the enormous amount of campaign funds available to the Democrats, they will use a great portion of those funds in the “politics of personal destruction”, by putting up “straw men” and scapegoats to try to confuse and distract us from the real issues facing all of us, and that is a stagnant economy and the complicity of Obama in it.
Turn around is fair play, so I would hope that the Republicans will turn the tables on the loony liberals and make them the scapegoats for what is happening to our once great country.
Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
1 comment:
How come Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats are now distancing themselves away from supporting the "Occupy Wall Sreet" protesters?
Could it be that the Democrats have been accepting millions of dollars from the very same 1% that the "Occupy" holligans have been protesting against? The George Soros backed protesters are now considered to to be a negative, whereas the "evil" Tea Party has survived the vicious attacks by the liberals and the main street media and are leading the charge against the re-elecion of Obama.
Post a Comment